+
All "paper x" placeholders replaced with proper numbered ACM-style citations.
+
Source counts now consistent across abstract (30), body (30), references (30), and flow diagram (N=30).
+
Use case fully restructured into subsections that mirror the four framework domains, including a dedicated Framework Evaluation subsection.
+
Database strategy expanded beyond Scopus to include Google Scholar with authoritative publisher filters (OECD, McKinsey) plus a supplementary targeted search.
+
A unifying conceptual diagram (Figure 1) and Key Findings table now provide the visual framework reviewers requested.
+
Six themes consolidated into four, improving thematic synthesis and reducing overlap.
+
Abstract and Introduction added, addressing Review 12's most critical structural concern.
−
No evidence-type classification (empirical / theoretical / practice) in references or appendix; compliance with the source-quota requirement is still not demonstrable from the document alone.
−
The Type-1 checklist is implicit in the Conclusions bullet questions rather than presented as a clearly labeled, stand-alone decision artifact.
−
The 50-citation threshold remains the default for the main Scopus search; its limitations are not explicitly acknowledged in the Gaps section.
−
Method section retains some informal first-person constructions ("We started with...", "We then turned to...").
−
Geographic bias acknowledged in Gaps but not translated into concrete guidance for non-Western contexts in the Conclusions, as suggested by Review 4.
−
The flow diagram is more legible but its dual-pipeline layout (main + targeted-search branch) is still visually crowded.