+
Clear and traceable methodology: Scopus query, timeframe, 599→265→47 funnel, PRISMA diagram, and explicit inclusion/exclusion criteria now documented.
+
The ambiguous "Weighted Performance" construct was eliminated and replaced by a clean dynamic-alignment model with five interdependent macro-categories.
+
Abstract and Conclusion are now present and informative, fixing a critical structural gap.
+
Privacy, governance, and ethical safeguards are integrated into the Objective System Properties layer rather than left as appendix material.
+
Comprehensive factor-to-reference mapping (Table 3) gives every coded concept clear source attribution, addressing replicability concerns.
+
Figure 1 has been redesigned and is no longer marred by typographical errors; the framework reads professionally.
+
Adaptive Trust Dynamics now explicitly models asymmetry, feedback loops, trust transfer, and mediation effects, strengthening the temporal account.
−
The ADAS use case continues to rephrase the framework with domain vocabulary instead of evaluating a real or simulated system on Measured / Perceived / Contextual axes.
−
§12 "Gaps and Future Work" still leans toward authors' methodological self-critique (English-only, citation bias, engineering background) rather than gaps in the literature itself (longitudinal trust recovery, high-stakes domains, cross-cultural studies).
−
No concrete trust-repair / recovery protocol is provided despite this being a specific consensus suggestion; trust repair is named but not operationalized.
−
Ethical breadth (dignity, autonomy, professional responsibility) and social-science depth (cognitive biases, trust heuristics) remain thin relative to the technical-governance treatment.
−
A minor governance/accountability typo remains ("trustoor and trustee" in Table 3 entries for [38] and [4]).
−
The use of [13] (Kim et al. 2022) to support "continuous learning / system evolution" is a stretch — that source is about service robots and social exchange theory, not online learning — and may signal residual mis-mapping in the coding scheme.