+
Methodology section is now fully transparent: databases, date range, Boolean queries (Table 1), and inclusion/exclusion criteria are all explicit (resolves R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R9).
+
Figure 1 replaces the textual funnel with a proper PRISMA-ScR flow chart — a direct fix to R3 and R1.
+
AI disclosure now contains the verification language reviewers asked for (R3, R4): tool scope, source verification by humans, and explicit confirmation that no citations were fabricated.
+
Corpus expanded from 18 to 48 sources, with a clear breakdown by evidence type (empirical / policy / theoretical), addressing R7 directly and R6/R9 indirectly.
+
Conclusion section (5.2) is now present, fixing R2's concern that the paper ended on gaps.
+
Table 2 cleanly maps themes -> factors -> evidence strength -> sources, and an evidence-strength rubric is now provided, resolving R4's request to clarify evidence-strength criteria.
+
The use case is more tightly evidenced: design-specific sources ([19], [20], [32], [38]) replace the previously unsupported quantitative claims, resolving R1's "50-100 variants" criticism.
+
Deskilling discussion is substantially strengthened with the Einstellung effect (Hou et al. [32]) and cognitive-offloading evidence (Shukla et al. [20]), responding to R6, R7, R8, and R9.
+
Contextual Integrity overlay (Section 3.5) makes the framework's transferability claim conceptually explicit by mapping themes onto roles/activities/norms/values.
−
Cross-industry transferability is argued conceptually rather than demonstrated through a second worked use case (R6 had suggested predictive maintenance).
−
Geographic bias is acknowledged in Section 5.1 as a limitation but the corpus itself remains predominantly Western-sourced.
−
Measurable readiness and deskilling metrics are described qualitatively; reviewers (R6, R7, R8) had encouraged moving toward quantifiable indicators.
−
The coding matrix is linked as a supplementary archive rather than included as an inline excerpt; R1 and R3 had asked for a visible extraction table with explicit "Context" and "Constraint" columns.
−
No risk-readiness matrix or factor-interaction visualization was added beyond the PRISMA chart and publication-year histogram.